Glycaemic response to three main meals or five smaller meals for patients on rapid-acting insulin

Main Article Content

Zhaolin Meng RN, PhD candidate
Jane Overland RN, PhD, NP
Xingping Shen MD, PhD
Xiaobin Wu RN, BS.Med
Yuanyuan Wang RN, BS.Med
Yunyun Liu RN, BS.Med

Keywords

type 2 diabetes mellitus, insulin aspart, glycaemic control, diet

Abstract

Objective: To compare seven-point blood glucose profiles of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using rapid-acting insulin, when daily calories were provided as three main meals versus five smaller meals (three main meals + two snacks), while maintaining the same total daily calorie intake and composition of carbohydrates, fats and protein.


Design: A cross-over study.


Setting: Xiamen University Zhongshan Hospital, China.


Subjects: Over a four week period, 22 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using fixed doses of rapid-acting insulin were recruited into the study. Two patients failed to complete the study and data from the remaining 20 subjects were analysed.


Intervention: The subjects using fixed doses of rapid-acting insulin were randomised to five smaller meals versus three main meals treatment periods. Glycaemic response to each meal pattern was measured by seven-point blood glucose profiles.


Main Outcome Measures: The mean seven-point blood glucose levels and the risk of hypoglycaemia.


Results: The mean seven-point blood glucose levels with the pattern of eating five smaller meals was lower than that with three main meals (9.1mmol/L vs. 9.5mmol/L), however the difference was not statistically significant (F=0.524, P=0.474). There were no differences in mean blood glucose levels across the seven-point profile. The risk of hypoglycaemia was also not statistically significant.


Conclusions: This suggests that it may be unnecessary for patients using rapid-acting insulin to have five smaller meals.

Abstract 86 | View PDF Downloads 82